On Communities

When I first saw this old recruitment video for librarians, it was easy to have a good laugh over how dated it was. But at its core, I see something more serious being expressed. Librarianships’ commitment to the community is an ongoing value, evident in this video as much as in any current library. However, this value is dependent on the definition of “community” and the goals associated with assisting them, both of which have changed over the nearly 60 years since this video was published.

While this video from the 40’s emphasizes services for people from “all walks of life”, it’s clear from the lack of racial diversity that this value applies mainly to white patrons, although of various class and physical ability. Libraries over the years have not been free of racist policies, such as segregated service, and so the definition of “community” was not intersectionally inclusive. The type of service provided has been problematic at times as well. The goal of the library was to provide information and education, but originated as a prescriptive service. This can be seen in the video, as librarians choose books for students to read, and in other vocational guides of a similar time, which describe a librarian’s responsibility to “nurture taste” in patrons (Currie, 1958). While it may have seemed admirable, having predominantly white, college-educated people controlling information dissemination comes with some pretty obvious issues.

Thankfully, libraries today, have made some steps forward with the rest of society in providing more inclusive services. But there are still more similarities with the libraries of the past than we might want. Like the librarians in the video, librarians in Canada today are predominantly white (8Rs Research Team, 2005), and there are still community groups who feel unwelcome in the library space. We might try to paint more hopeful picture of libraries today with a justification of our value of neutral service which, at the very least, is better than prescriptive service, since it lets the patrons pick and interpret their own information. While a truly neutral service may play a role in upholding principles of freedom of information, I’d argue that library service is not neutral. The systems and tools we use, such as DDC and LCC, are still outdated, with euro-centric bias. We’ve pushed our own ideas of information literacy, only recently recognizing the value of recognizing that literacy takes many forms depending on the patron or community (Elmborg, 2006). In order to move forward from the picture of libraries seen in the video, we need to recognize these problematic prescriptive practices.

However, there are some instances where breaking from neutrality can be not only beneficial to libraries and their communities, but, in my opinion, necessary. When political causes arise that strive to improve their community, the library should be supportive. By listening to the community, perhaps librarians will move past the problematic aspects of prescriptive service and neutral service as they move forward.


8Rs Research Team (2005, February). The Future of Human Resources in Canadian Libraries [PDF document]. Retrieved from http://www.ls.ualberta.ca/8rs/8RsFutureofHRLibraries.pdf
Currie, C. (1958). Be a librarian: a guide to careers in modern librarianship. London: C. Lockwood.
Elmborg, J. (2006). Critical Information Literacy: Implications for Instructional Practice. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 32(2): 192-99.


Article Recommendation: Gendered Expectations for Leadership in Libraries

A recent article from In The Library with the Leadpipe caught my attention. It’s an explanation of, and call to action against the misogynistic ideals of library management which can hinder women in taking on leadership roles. Jessica Olin and Michelle Millet do a great job of explaining the prevalence of this issue, looking at both lived experiences of women in librarianship and published research:

Gendered Expectations for Leadership in Libraries – Jessica Olin and Michelle Millet

Given the prevalence of this problem in many different professions, it sadly shouldn’t be surprising that it’s in issue in the “feminine” profession of librarianship. However, in my life previous to entering this program, I was still detached from that reality, and some naïve part of me hoped that I could circumvent that issue in my own career. But the issue isn’t improving fast enough. In Olin & Millet’s example of academic libraries, there’s still a 30% disparity between the amount of female librarians total and the amount of female librarians in management. This article is a reminder to all of us that we need to engage more actively in the problem to make it change. As the authors state:

At the very least, our leadership literature and training needs to be gender-inclusive (meaning that it specifically addresses the challenges of gender) instead of gender-neutral (which usually comes out male-oriented).

Librarianship’s professional value of neutrality may have a time and place, but this is not it. I think we can, however, take the value we place on education to create more informed and progressive institutions when it comes to gender equality.


Many times this week, my first in the MLIS program, I’ve had to answer the question of why I chose to come here. My response is usually to talk about the event that inspired me to look into information sciences, a curation project of dance literature that I did as an independent study. My supervisor wanted to do a cross-cultural comparison of dance types, but the disorganization of dance performance literature made it difficult to do empirically. I was tasked with creating a classification scheme to record standardized information for each dance, and build a database to easily search for specific features of the dances. It was such a fun and rewarding problem to solve, that I wanted to do it on a larger scale. The issues of accessibility within the library and information science field started to sound really interesting. After realizing this, other reasons for pursuing an MLIS just clicked. It would be an opportunity to promote education and literacy, and to be a constant learner myself. I would be motivated to keep pursuing my newfound interest in tech. And of course, I’d be able to help other people.

I haven’t yet narrowed down my options for specifically how or where to do this; my interest in preserving knowledge lead me towards archives, especially digitization, but I’m also drawn to the idea of working with public libraries, and there’s a small, potentially masochistic, part of me that also loves research. This blog will hopefully be a place where I can explore and relate these different interests. Whether or not I can reconcile them all into one career area I’m not yet sure, but given the diversity of areas in the field, I’m sure I’ll find something I love.

Starting the journey. Photo credit: Lindsay Taylor
Starting the journey. Photo credit: Lindsay Taylor

There are, of course, still doubts that creep in sometimes. From talking to some peers, I gather that most of us have gotten funny looks or concerned remarks when we talk about our choice to do an MLIS. “Are there really any jobs in that area?” “Aren’t there better opportunities in a more prestigious field?” “Sounds boring to me.” Even though I disagree with them, it can sometimes be difficult to completely dismiss the doubt that comes with these statements, especially as someone without much experience yet in the field. But the passion in this program is contagious, and gives me a warm reminder of why I first decided to come here. It’s hard to feel like you made a bad choice in picking this path when everyone around you is engaged in critical thought about accessibility issues, and determined to help other people. It might sound simple to others, but it’s going to take some serious work, and it’ll be worth it.

Photo credit: Lindsay Taylor
Photo credit: Lindsay Taylor